Often but many responders made strong cases for other programs. To my questions about software for building experiments.
Hi Everyone: I received a LOT of helpful responses Any thoughts on the pros andĬons of existing programs would be very much appreciated! Thanks inīrent Simpson University of South Carolina Summary Software for a wide range of experiments). Of time "programming") and 2) generality (I'd like to be able to use the My primary concerns are 1) ease of use (I don't want to spend a lot The problem is that I know very little about what's out Pencil/paper or programs designed specifically for a particular problem.īut I would like to start using an all-purpose program (such as MediaLab) to build social Greetings: I've been conducting experiments using Of choice where assistance with standard paradigms and a quick start withĮxperimenting is the major objective." read article The other packages require generating longer and more complexĭefinitions (Inquisit), or first becoming acquainted with a multiwindow Specifying the stimulus item, its location, and presentation time in a A simple experiment is most easily implemented withĭirectRT's simple list structure syntax, essentially reducing the task to Experimental Psychology, 53,Ģ18-232: "Among the reviewed packages, DirectRT achieves the mostĬomplexity reduction. Software for generating psychologicalĮxperiments. January 6th, 2007 July 7th, 2005 November 9th, 2004 JanuDirectRT v2006 Review, Experimental Where possible, we've added links to the websites of the other With that said, we post them here anywaysīecause MediaLab and DirectRT usually come out looking pretty good. These results are extremely informal and biased Social Psychology list serve produces an informal survey of psychologyĮxperiment software. Summaries Occasionally, the Society for Personality and
0 kommentar(er)
